Are You Ready for Global Clinical Engineering Day?

ce-day

On behalf of the Global Clinical Engineering Advisory Board, you are invited to participate and engage in a day-long recognition event celebrating the contributions clinical engineers make every day. Health technology is vital to global health care and therefore its optimal management has never been more critical for patient outcomes.

On October 21, 2016, the first Global Clinical Engineering Day will be celebrated around the world. On that day, for 24 hours, the website http://global.icehtmc.com will feature interviews with members of the CE community, highlighting associations function from around the world such as ACCE, chat room in different languages, and streaming videos showing off various CE roles and functions.

You are invited to submit photos and, more important, short videos to be broadcast throughout that day. Rotating around the world in each of the world’s time zones, delegates will be online sharing their experiences and responding to participants’ comments. Short videos of up to 5 minutes are preferred as well other material like brochures, professional success stories and similar content are welcome. Please create a video of your department and send it over so we can show off our accomplishments.

This event is sponsored by an international group supported by the International Federation of Biological and Medical Engineering (IFMBE) Clinical Engineering Division (CED), in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), and national CE associations including those in Italy, Brazil and China.

For more information, please feel free to contact Yadin David, CE Advisory Board Chairman at David@BiomedEng.com.

Source: technation_logo_orange-gray-2411
Advertisements

Creative Problem Solving and the Future of HTM

Published on May 9, 2016

http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photos-problem-solving-series-image1053963

This article will appear with 24×7’s June 2016 anniversary coverage.

 It’s been more than 30 years since my first exposure to clinical engineering. Many things have changed, but some key principles have stayed the same.

I became the director of Environmental Services at a 160-bed Level 3 trauma hospital in central Minnesota in 1985. Given my construction background, this healthcare environment was brand-new to me, including managing Clinical Engineering. Fortunately, I met Jon Hilleren, CBET, who immediately impressed and relieved me.

I was impressed because not only were Jon’s technical skills sound, but he was a visionary for the time. Shortly after I started, he shared an idea to begin reaching out and supporting smaller hospitals that did not have skilled clinical engineers to perform scheduled preventive maintenance (PM) or repairs. Together, we grew the program to include a clinical engineer who would travel on a circuit in a van to help these smaller organizations. I was relieved when Jon assured me I would never have to be concerned about the medical equipment missing a scheduled PM, and that all our medical equipment would be reliable and safe for patient care.

What Jon had was the ability to be a creative thinker and problem solver—the two key attributes of a great healthcare technology management (HTM) professional. Despite all the changes to clinical engineering and healthcare technology, time and again these two traits make the difference.

Take my next significant encounter with healthcare technology. I worked with the American Society for Healthcare Engineering (ASHE) as the director of codes and compliance in the late 1990s. This was just as digital high-definition (HD) broadcasting was being rolled out. I recall one Saturday afternoon when a telemetry unit was knocked offline. When the clinical engineer arrived to troubleshoot, he first rebooted the equipment, which immediately started up. The next day the telemetry unit went down a second time. Only, when the clinical engineer arrived and attempted to reset the system, it did not respond although the equipment was fine.

Thinking outside the box, he recalled that a TV manufacturer was planning an HD demonstration across the street at a local mall. A bit of investigating revealed that the TV was broadcasting on the same frequency as the hospital’s telemetry unit, causing the telemetry to fail. (This discovery later led to an agreement with the Federal Communications Commission to protect hospital-based telemetry, managed by ASHE.)

There was also the instance a few years back when endoscopes were first being identified as contributing to healthcare-associated infections. I reached out to the HTM community, asking it to begin adding scopes to its equipment inventory. My intent was not so much to track endoscopes, but rather to motivate the HTM community to get involved by going to the endoscope processing room and reviewing the sterilization procedures. The skills HTM brought to these rooms made a real impact on these processes.

Creative thinking and problem solving were integral to these examples. Fortunately, those same character traits are evident today wherever I speak or meet with HTM professionals—and they need to be now more than ever.

Moving from the bench to patient care delivery, today’s clinical engineer must develop the relationship between IT and patient care. Our industry is about more than just performing scheduled maintenance and repairs on an IV pump. Now more than ever, it requires systems thinking to understand how an IV device is part of a medication-delivery system that needs to correctly identify the patient, communicate with the pharmacy to verify that the drug is appropriate and won’t interact with other medications, is prescribed at the right dose, and will be delivered at the correct dose rate. This requires HTM to understand all the systems involved behind the scenes, train and develop the users, ensure the equipment can be supported by the organization’s intranet, and provide council to leadership as new equipment and technologies are
being considered
.

This same initiative must be evident when new equipment is brought into the organization. Often it is not the IT department that will be troubleshooting the installation, but the HTM team. IT may be able to program and prepare the network, but ensuring that the system’s clinical requirements are met often falls to HTM, especially when it comes time to verify that a system actually delivers the intended outcomes. HTM must be able to work with IT to ensure that the network can support the medical equipment, and that the medical equipment is readily available and reliable.

Over the past 30 years, including since my return to The Joint Commission in 2005, I have become convinced that the resources available from the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the American College of Clinical Engineering, and 24×7 continue to strengthen the HTM industry. Certification opportunities confirm the skills and dedication of its members to the field. New higher education programs are available, equipping the next generation of technicians with the skills to continue to protect patients.

Today’s HTM professionals must be competent, creative problem solvers. They must be an established resource to all clinical users of medical equipment. They must be a stable, reliable team that manages today’s healthcare technology—just as they were when I first encountered them more than three decades ago.

George Mills, MBA, FASHE, CEM, CHFM, CHSP, is director, Department of Engineering, The Joint Commission.

Source: 24×7 Magazine

Top 6 FAQs when Choosing Healthcare Power Products

Selecting compliant power products is an essential but often confusing part of a healthcare manager’s job. If you purchase power strips, surge protectors, isolation transformers or uninterruptible power supplies for your facility, the following questions and answers will help you make an informed choice.

Top 6 FAQs

1. How does location affect my choice of power products?
Where you install your power products can determine the type of product you need to purchase. From a regulatory standpoint, there are two distinct areas within healthcare facilities: inside the patient-care room and outside the patient-care room. If a power product is installed inside a patient-care room, it must be “medical-grade” and UL 60601-1 compliant.

2. How is a “patient-care room” defined?
A patient-care room is “any area within a healthcare facility where patients are intended to be examined or treated.” Patient-care rooms include both general- and critical-care areas:

  • General-Care Areas—patient bedrooms, examining rooms, treatment rooms, clinics and similar areas where patients come in contact with “ordinary devices” such as nurse call systems, electrical beds, examining lamps, telephone or entertainment devices and electro-medical equipment.
  • Critical-Care Areas—special care units such as intensive care units, delivery rooms, operating rooms, coronary care units, angiography labs and other areas where patients will be subjected to invasive procedures and connected to on-line electro-medical devices.

3. How is “patient care vicinity” defined?
Patient care vicinity is “a space within a location intended for the examination and treatment of patients (i.e., patient care room) extending 6 ft. beyond the normal location of the bed, chair, table, treadmill, or other device that supports the patient during examination and treatment and extends vertically 7 ft. 6 in. above the floor.”

4. What is the difference between “medical-grade” and “hospital-grade”?
These terms are often used synonymously. “Medical-Grade” power products are UL 60601-1 compliant and designed for use inside the patient care vicinity. They are not to be confused with power products that feature a “Hospital-Grade” plug and/or receptacles.

Many healthcare facilities unknowingly install non-compliant power strips, surge protectors and backup power supplies in patient-care rooms, believing that all models with hospital-grade plugs and receptacles are UL 60601-1 compliant. They are not. The use of non-compliant products can be dangerous and should be immediately replaced by fully-compliant models.

5. What is the difference between “UL-Listed” and “UL-Recognized”?
Two power strips can meet the requirements of the same UL standard (60601-1, for example) but receive two different UL ratings: either “listed” or “recognized.” The difference is simple: UL “lists” a stand-alone product, but “recognizes” a product that is a component of a larger system. In healthcare applications, power strips that stand alone and are not designed as components of a larger system are UL-listed.

6. What standards apply to mobile applications?
Some diagnosis, treatment, or monitoring equipment can be moved in and out of the patient-care vicinity and is therefore subject to the UL 60601-1 standard. Specialty purpose power strips and backup power supplies are available as components of larger medical systems. These products are UL-recognized for 60601-1 and 1363a standards and can be used both inside and outside of patient-care rooms.

  • UL 60601-1: patient shock-prevention measure required for all devices that potentially come in contact with patients and staff.
  • UL 1363a: standard for power strips that are integrated as components of a larger system, where they supply power to equipment in movable assembly that is rack, table or pedestal-mounted.

Source: TRIPP.LITE

The NEMA Publishes X-ray Equipment Standard

Published on June 13, 2016

The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) has published NEMA XR 31-2016: Standard Attributes on X-ray Equipment for Interventional Procedures—a standard developed by its Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance (MITA) division. This standard,  which uses MITA Smart Dose Interventional technology, offers healthcare providers tangible ways to manage patient radiation dose delivery while still enabling x-ray systems to provide sufficient image quality needed by physicians.

NEMA XR 31-2016 describes eight features that should be taken into consideration when performing risk management evaluations on existing stationary x-ray interventional equipment. They include: digital x-ray imaging device classification, dosimetric indication, added filters, range of air kerma rates in fluoroscopy, last-image-hold, virtual collimation, stored fluoroscopy, and variable-pulsed fluoroscopy.

“MITA is dedicated to developing standards for medical imaging equipment that enhances patient safety by providing dose reduction, mitigation, and management features,” says Megan Hayes, MITA’s director of regulatory and standards strategy. “The MITA Smart Dose Interventional standard identifies state-of-the-art attributes that will help manage patient dose while ensuring high image quality for the physician.”

NEMA XR 31-2016 may be downloaded at no cost on NEMA’s Website.

Source: 24×7 Magazine

AAMI Spotlights Influence of Healthcare Technology on Patient Safety

Posted March 15, 2016

“On April 17, 2003, I died.”

That year, Matt Whitman, a Michigan state trooper, now retired, was hit by a drunk driver and had to undergo neck surgery. The operation went smoothly, but in the recovery room, a new danger emerged. He was placed on a morphine pump for the pain, but without any electronic monitoring. That night, he stopped breathing—a case of respiratory failure induced by the opioids he was taking. Were it not for a nurse passing by his room to look for an item for another patient, Whitman believes he would be dead.

“I heard you take your last breath,” Whitman recalled the nurse telling him. The nurse called a Code Blue, and a team of doctors resuscitated Whitman. When he came to, a priest was holding his hand.

Unfortunately, not everyone is as lucky as Whitman, and experiences like his are all too common.

According to the National Patient Safety Foundation, one in 10 patients will develop a healthcare-acquired condition during hospitalization. Overall, medical error has been estimated to cause 44,000 to 98,000 deaths in hospitals each year, with recent research suggesting the number could be as high as 440,000 deaths.

Patient safety has become a major public health issue, and this week is dedicated to increasing awareness among healthcare professionals and the public. In recognition of Patient Safety Awareness Week, AAMI is shining a light on the crucial and growing role that safe and effective healthcare technology plays in patient outcomes.

“Advances in healthcare technology are helping patients in ways we could not have imagined not too long ago. Many hospitals are saving lives by integrating technologies such as continuous electronic monitoring of patients on opioids and smart infusion pumps as tools to support the work of clinicians,” said Marilyn Neder Flack, senior vice president of patient safety initiatives at AAMI and executive director of the AAMI Foundation. “At the same time, it can be a challenge to ensure that healthcare technology is developed and used in the best way possible—always with an eye on clinical workflow and patient safety. The AAMI Foundation is committed to tackling these complex issues through our patient safety initiatives. Today, under the Foundation umbrella, more than 100 committed individuals are working toward achieving the goal that no patient will be harmed by healthcare technology.”

The AAMI Foundation’s initiatives are focused on infusion systems, clinical alarms, continuous monitoring of patients on opioids, and home health infusions.

All of AAMI functions with an appreciation for the ultimate goal of advancing patient safety, whether in the form of training webinars for industry professionals, certification options for technicians and specialists, or developing standards for medical devices and healthcare technology.

AAMI President Mary Logan stressed that the association’s mission is to provide global leadership to support the healthcare community in the development, management, and use of safe and effective healthcare technology.

“Patient safety is at the heart of everything that we do,” Logan said. “By developing standards, AAMI works to ensure that all medical devices are designed and manufactured with quality, safety, and usability in mind. By educating and certifying the healthcare technology management professionals who implement and service these devices, we help ensure that patients receive the highest quality care. And by bringing all stakeholders to the table when we discuss mutual challenges, we support the goal of finding lasting and comprehensive solutions.”

AAMI has a host of resources focusing on specific aspects of healthcare technology. All of these resources can be found at www.aami.org.

The Smartphone Is a Smart Tool for Biomeds

Steven J. Yelton

April 11, 2016

As a college professor as well as a senior consultant for a clinical engineering department of a hospital, I have the privilege of working with people of all age groups. Most, if not all, have a smartphone. I have been very impressed at what a great tool it has been.

Before I go any farther, I have to say that on my classroom and laboratory, we have ground rules for use of smartphones, tablets, laptops, or similar devices. During a test, students definitely cannot use them.

During lectures, I basically ban the use of smartphones as well. I explain to my students that the use of such devices during a lecture is disruptive because as soon as someone starts looking at a screen, the students behind that person are straining to see what is on the screen. The first time that students see this happen with someone else in class, they are believers! The fact that students cannot use their smartphones during lectures hopefully forces them to develop their listening skills. There are few things worse than trying to carry on a conversation with or present a lecture to people who are also “on” their phone. They aren’t multitasking; they are rude.

If their phone rings, beeps, chirps, or preferably vibrates during a lecture, students are expected to quietly leave the room and take care of the situation. Most of my students have families, jobs, and other commitments in which an emergency might arise, and it’s important to recognize that fact. They learn that they should be courteous to the other students and professors.

That being said, I am a big fan of this technology when used with good manners.

I cannot tell you how many times students have used their smartphones to text a friend or colleague for information to help solve a lab problem. It could be something as simple as finding out the factory default password setting for a patient monitor. Smartphones have a camera, so students can take photos of things such as serial numbers, displays, or connections. They can email this information to others when they need help figuring out a particular challenge. They often include these photos in their lab reports. Such actions are not cheating; they represent a good use of students’ time. Once they figure out a problem, they will know the answer from then on. I don’t think that taking hours looking for the solution is any more valuable than finding help faster. (By the way, getting such help isn’t allowed during tests!)

The use of a smartphone in class can be beneficial in other ways. One time, I saw students using FaceTime to get another pair of eyes on a problem. We had a device in the lab with a particularly tricky problem. The students worked on it as a group. Even with some hints from the professor, they were having difficulty. They connected with a technician from one of the student’s co-op job via FaceTime to discuss the problem. I was very impressed that they were able to very clearly define the problem, show how the device reacted to inputs, and then get advice on how to proceed. The smartphone connects the world! I later found out that technicians from developing countries communicate with others via FaceTime to help solve problems. Not long ago, it would have been impossible to get help from faraway experts so quickly.

In conclusion, we need to embrace the technology, but do so with courtesy—and remember that the person standing in front of you takes priority.

Source:  AAMIBlog